County of maui v. hawaii wildlife fund

of the United States Supreme Court in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020) (“Maui”), on a case by case basis, in the Clean Water Act (CWA or the Act) Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program.2. The Maui decision outlines seven

Read Hawai'i Wildlife Fund v. Cnty. of Maui, CIVIL NO. 12-00198 SOM/BMK, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext's comprehensive legal database ... Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al. v. County of Maui; Civil No. 12-00198 SOM/BMK; ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS . Rapanos v.In 2020, the Supreme Court held that wastewater injection wells can be a regulated pollution source under the Clean Water Act in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund , 140 S.Ct. 1462.Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case challenging federal jurisdiction to regulate isolated wetlands under the Clean Water Act.It was the first major environmental case heard by the newly appointed Chief Justice, John Roberts, and Associate Justice Samuel Alito.The Supreme Court heard the case on February 21, 2006, and issued a decision on June ...Hawaii Gov. Josh Green is trying to build a recovery fund for victims of the Maui wildfires that would include contributions from Hawaiian Electric, which has been blamed for starting the fires ...On April 23, 2020, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), a case which pitted environmental groups ... The County of Maui appealed the Ninth Circuit's decision and argued that the CWA's permittingThe opinions collected here are those issued during October Term 2019 (October 07, 2019, through October 04, 2020).Opinions are posted on the website upon release in slip opinion format. Slip opinions remain posted until replaced with opinions edited to reflect the usual publication style of the United States Reports, including final …On April 23rd, the Supreme Court handed environmentalists a victory in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, holding that the Clean Water Act (CWA) regulates discharges of pollution into groundwater that emerge in surface water if “functionally equivalent” to direct surface water discharges. Justice Breyer wrote the six to three majority ...In this webinar, three current and former Duke Law School faculty members—Michelle Nowlin, Steve Roady, and Shannon Arata—discuss the U.S. Supreme Court's ru...

Apr 28, 2020 · The issue in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, one which had long divided the lower courts, was this: everyone agrees that the Clean Water Act regulates, and requires National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits for, the discharge of pollutants to waters of the United States from point sources; and everyone agrees that ... 2022] County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund 553 the Court’s decision in County of Maui does create a broad rule, it is the right decision by the Court to ensure States’ rights and …In an attempt to clarify, the United States Supreme Court in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund ruled that permits are required not just for direct point-source discharges, but also for any point-source discharge that is the “functional equivalent” of a direct point-source discharge.HONOLULU (HawaiiNewsNow) - The governor, Maui's mayor, other government officials and nonprofit leaders will hold a news conference Wednesday to discuss wildfire recovery efforts. The news ...The petitioner, the County of Maui, operates a wastewater reclamation facility on the island of Maui, Hawaii. The facility collects sewage from the surrounding area, partially treats it, and pumps the treated water through four wells hundreds of feet underground.On April 23, 2020, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), a case which pitted environmental groups ... The County of Maui appealed the Ninth Circuit's decision and argued that the CWA's permitting23 avr. 2020 ... Several environmental groups, including the Hawaii Wildlife Fund, Sierra Club-Maui ... Maui.” — Maui County Councilwoman Kelly King. Maui County ...

The U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund (Maui) on April. 23, 2020.1 Until then, there was a split among the.Nov 6, 2019 · County of Maui, Hawaii Respondent Hawaii Wildlife Fund Docket no. 18-260 Decided by Roberts Court Lower court United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Citation 590 US _ (2020) Granted Feb 19, 2019 Argued Nov 6, 2019 Decided Apr 23, 2020 Advocates Elbert Lin for the petitioner 9 déc. 2020 ... ... the U.S. Supreme Court's recent County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund decision should be applied to its Clean Water Act NPDES permittingClean Water Act: County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund11 In one of its major environmental rulings of the 2019-2020 term, the Supreme Court addressed the scope of the CWA’s applicability to pollutant discharges that migrate through groundwater to regulated navigable surface waters.12 In County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, the Court held On Appeal from the U.S. District Court, Dist. of Hawaii No. 12-cv-198, Hon. Susan Oki Mollway, District Judge BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES ... Hawai'i Wildlife Fund v. County of Maui, 24 F. Supp. 3d 980 (D. Haw. 2014) ..... passim Headwaters, Inc. v. Talent ...

Jalon daniels nil.

The County of Maui's wastewater reclamation facility sent millions of gallons of partially treated water through half a mile of groundwater, eventually ending up in the ocean. ... The court ruled in a 6 to 3 vote in favor of the Hawaii Wildlife Fund. Tags : Categories : Uncategorized. Leave a Reply Cancel reply. Your email address will not be ...In a victory for NAHB and home builders, the U.S. Supreme Court on April 3 rendered a 6-3 decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. The case concerns whether pollutants that enter groundwater — and then reach navigable waters — are regulated under the Clean Water Act.County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund is a case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on November 6, 2019, during the court's October 2019-2020 term.The case came on a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.. The court vacated and remanded the 9th Circuit's decision in a 6-3 ruling. The court held "a permit is required when there is ...See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . Syllabus . COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII. v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND . ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT . No. 18–260. Argued November 6, 2019—Decided April 23, 2020 COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII, PETITIONER v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND, ET AL. Notice: The LEXIS pagination of this document is subject to change pending release of the final published version. Prior History: [**1] ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Hawai'i Wildlife Fund v. Cty. of Maui, 886 F.3d 737,

Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 42,700 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 988 casebooks https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-...Justice Breyer used a folksy culinary analogy in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, decided April 23, 2020, to explain why a NPDES permit could be required for the discharge of wastewater to groundwater and then into navigable waters. Justice Alito in a strongly worded dissenting opinion accused the majority of departing from interpreting statutory text and creating its own legal rule ...Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al. v. County of Maui, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 1476 (2020). The Supreme Court provided examples of when there would be and when there would not be a "functional equivalent of a direct discharge," explaining that time and distance are important:Oct 7, 2019 · The opinions collected here are those issued during October Term 2019 (October 07, 2019, through October 04, 2020). Opinions are posted on the website upon release in slip opinion format. Slip opinions remain posted until replaced with opinions edited to reflect the usual publication style of the United States Reports, including final ... Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al. v. County of Maui, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 1476 (2020). The Supreme Court provided examples of when there would be and when there would not be a "functional equivalent of a direct discharge," explaining that time and distance are important:waters” question. To that end, the Court granted certiorari in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund on February 19, 2019.12 In Maui, a group of environmental non-profit organizations alleged that the County of Maui was operating a wastewater facility in violation of the CWA.13 The County ’sThe Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing a draft memorandum to provide guidance to the regulated community and permitting authorities on applying the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020), in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant …Court's recent Clean Water Act (CWA) decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260 (U.S. Apr. 23, 2020). These entities may now face both governmental and private suits if they fail to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from state or federal authorities—even though they are notCounty of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund and Its Impact on Clean Water Act Jurisprudence. Authors. Sydney Bale. Recommended Citation. Sydney Bale, County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund and Its Impact on Clean Water Act Jurisprudence, 7 Oil & Gas, Nat. Resources & Energy J. 551 (2022), ...Court’s recent Clean Water Act (CWA) decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260 (U.S. Apr. 23, 2020). These entities may now face both governmental and private suits if they fail to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from state or federal authorities—even though they are not

HAWAI`I WILDLIFE FUND, a Hawaii non-profit corporation; SIERRA CLUB-MAUI GROUP, a non-profit corporation; SURFRIDER FOUNDATION, a non- ... County of Maui, ECF No. 432-3, PageID #s 10377-78. The County began discharging wastewater into Wells 1 and 2 in May 1982. It

Today the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, addressing whether the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires a permit when pollutants originate from a point source but are conveyed to navigable waters by a nonpoint source, such as groundwater.The issue has historically been controversial …“County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund.” Oyez, https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/18-260. Environmental Works. “History of the Clean Water Act ...The main Hawaiian islands from largest to smallest in terms of area are Hawaii, Maui, Oahu, Kauai, Molokai, Lanai, Niihau and Kahoolawe. The islands’ land areas range from 4,028 square miles for Hawaii to 44 square miles for Kahoolawe.1 County of Maui v. Haw. Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 1468 (2020). 2 A point source is defined as “any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance.” 33 U.S.C.S. § 1362(14) (LexisNexis 2021). 3 County of Maui, 140 S. Ct. at 1468. 4 Id. at 1476–77. 5 See Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006) (plurality opinion) (considering ...The U.S. Supreme Court's April 23 decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund proves that legislating is best done by. Congress, not the courts. The ...Plaintiffs Hawaii Wildlife Fund, Sierra Club, Surfrider Foundation, and West Maui Preservation Association move for summary judgment, arguing that the undisputed …It wrote that, because the "path to the ocean is clearly ascertainable," the discharge from Maui's wells into the nearby groundwater was "functionally one into navigable water." 24 F.Supp.3d 980, 998 (Haw. 2014). And it granted summary judgment in favor of the environmental groups. See id., at 1005.27 jui. 2023 ... These cases are County of Maui,. Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund,89 and Inland Empire Water Keeper v. Corona Clay Co.90 These two cases are very ...21 sept. 2021 ... ... County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, which devised a test that says permits are required under the CWA when indirect discharges ...

Sfgiants score.

By law meaning.

Feb 1, 2018 · Haw. Wildlife Fund v. Cty. of Maui, Civil No. 12-00198 SOM/BMK, 2015 WL 328227, at *5–6 (D. Haw. Jan. 23, 2015). The court acknowledged that no study confirms the “point of entry into the ocean of flow from [W]ells 1 and 2.” Id. at *2. But it nonetheless held against the County after “repeatedly Hawaii Wildlife Fund - Harvard Law Review. County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. In an attempt to resolve a years-long dispute over the scope of the Clean …"AUTHORIZING SETTLEMENT IN HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND, ET AL. V. COUNTY OF MAUI, CIVIL 12-00198 SOM BMK, U.S. SUPREME COURT CASE 18-260," adopted on September 20, 2019. On behalf of your client, the Maui County Council, may I please request the Department of the Corporation Counsel promptly: Execute a settlement agreement consistent with Resolution ...Home supreme County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund Provided by Justia Syllabus Opinion of The Court Opinion (Breyer) Facts of the Case Provided by Oyez21 sept. 2021 ... ... County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, which devised a test that says permits are required under the CWA when indirect discharges ...That question is at the root of County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, which the Supreme Court agreed today to hear. PLF has filed a friend-of-the-court brief in this case. This case is about whether the Clean Water Act regulates pollution that reaches surface water by means of groundwater.Apr 23, 2020 · It wrote that, because the "path to the ocean is clearly ascertainable," the discharge from Maui's wells into the nearby groundwater was "functionally one into navigable water." 24 F.Supp.3d 980, 998 (Haw. 2014). And it granted summary judgment in favor of the environmental groups. See id., at 1005. Nov 6, 2019 · County of Maui, Hawaii Respondent Hawaii Wildlife Fund Docket no. 18-260 Decided by Roberts Court Lower court United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Citation 590 US _ (2020) Granted Feb 19, 2019 Argued Nov 6, 2019 Decided Apr 23, 2020 Advocates Elbert Lin for the petitioner This memorandum provides focused guidance to the regulated community and permitting authorities, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, on applying the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020), on a case by case basis, in the Clean Water Act Section 402 ...Wildlife Fund v. Cnty. of Maui, CIVIL NO. 12-00198 SOM/KJM, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext's comprehensive legal database ... Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al. v. County of Maui, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 1468 (2020). In other words, a person desiring to discharge any pollutant from a point source into the navigable waters of the United States ...See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . Syllabus . COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII. v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND . ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT . No. 18-260. Argued November 6, 2019—Decided April 23, 2020 ….

Full title: County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. Court: U.S. Supreme Court. Date published: Apr 23, 2020In a victory for NAHB and home builders, the U.S. Supreme Court on April 3 rendered a 6-3 decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. The case concerns whether pollutants that enter groundwater — and then reach navigable waters — are regulated under the Clean Water Act.Court’s recent Clean Water Act (CWA) decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260 (U.S. Apr. 23, 2020). These entities may now face both governmental and private suits if they fail to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from state or federal authorities—even though they are notThe case stems from a dispute between the county and a group of environmental nonprofits led by the Hawaii Wildlife Fund, Sierra Club of Maui and Surfrider Foundation over millions of gallons that ...See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . Syllabus . COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII. v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND . ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT . No. 18-260. Argued November 6, 2019—Decided April 23, 2020HAWAI`I WILDLIFE FUND, a Hawaii non-profit corporation; SIERRA CLUB-MAUI GROUP, a non-profit corporation; SURFRIDER FOUNDATION, a non- ... County of Maui, ECF No. 432-3, PageID #s 10377-78. The County began discharging wastewater into Wells 1 and 2 in May 1982. ItAccordingly, EPA conducted a review of the Maui guidance. In April 2020, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, addressing the question of whether a Clean Water Act NPDES permit is required for releases of pollutants from a point source to a jurisdictional water through groundwater. 140 S.Ct. 1462 (2020).Court's recent Clean Water Act (CWA) decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260 (U.S. Apr. 23, 2020). These entities may now face both governmental and private suits if they fail to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from state or federal authorities—even though they are notThe Supreme Court will render a decision soon in The County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 881 F.3d 754 (9th Cir. 2018) case. This is a pivotal Clean Water Act case because of the potential for widespread impact, which will require permits in broader situations encompassing point sources and groundwater. County of maui v. hawaii wildlife fund, In County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, the Supreme Court held 6-3 that when there is a “functional equivalent of a direct discharge” from a point source to navigable waters, an appropriate permit is required under the CWA. This ruling, according to several policy experts, is expected to cause future uncertainties and continued ... , Court's recent Clean Water Act (CWA) decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260 (U.S. Apr. 23, 2020). These entities may now face both governmental and private suits if they fail to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from state or federal authorities—even though they are not, 2022] County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund 553 the Court’s decision in County of Maui does create a broad rule, it is the right decision by the Court to ensure States’ rights and the purpose of the CWA remains intact. The language of the CWA is intended to be vague and, As of Oct. 6, the fund had raised $138,498,958 — more than double the $60 million raised through all Maui relief GoFundMe pages. The Hawaii Community Foundation models the disbursement on a FEMA ..., Nov 6, 2019 · Record received from the U.S.D.C. of Hawaii is electronic and located on PACER, with the exception of electronically filed Sealed documents. Oct 03 2019: Letter of respondents Hawai'i Wildlife Fund, et al. filed. Oct 04 2019: Letter of petitioner County of Maui, Hawaii filed. Oct 10 2019: Letter of petitioner County of Maui, Hawaii filed. Nov ... , Applying the Supreme Court's County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund Decision in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Program. Document date. 1/14/2021. Document SKU. AD05255. Document ID. AD05255. Purchase Document. Site Links. Home; Sitemap; Contact; For Members; Sign in;, The Supreme Court's most recent voyage into Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisprudence came in County of Maui, Hawaii v.Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 590 U. S. ____ (2020) (Slip Op.), which concerned whether ..., The much-anticipated United States Supreme Court decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund was released last week. It is a fascinating decision that results in the Court adopting a “functional equivalent” test. [Click here.] Background Under the federal Clean Water Act, it is unlawful to discharge a pollutant from a point source …, Hawaii Wildlife Fund. County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 590 U.S. ___ (2020) Docket No. 18-260. Granted: February 18, 2019. Argued: November 5, 2019. Justia Summary. Maui’s wastewater reclamation facility collects sewage, partially treats it, and daily pumps around four million gallons of treated water into the ground through four wells. , County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund is a case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on November 6, 2019, during the court's October 2019-2020 term.The case came on a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.. The court vacated and remanded the 9th Circuit's decision in a 6-3 ruling. The court held "a permit is required when there is ..., WASHINGTON — EPA has rescinded a guidance document issued in the final days of the Trump Administration that blatantly misinterpreted the Supreme Court’s decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. “This hastily-issued guidance document allowed polluters more leeway than either the Maui decision or the Clean …, Hawaii Wildlife Fund on a case-by-case basis to National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. Under Maui , systems or facilities that discharge a pollutant from a point source into ground water that reaches a water of the United States that is the functional equivalent of a direct discharge from a point source requires a ..., 30 avr. 2020 ... County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund - Interview with Professor Steph Tai · We're going live at 3 pm to discuss the Supreme Court's recent ..., Read Hawai'i Wildlife Fund v. Cnty. of Maui, CIVIL NO. 12-00198 SOM/BMK, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext's comprehensive legal database ... Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al. v. County of Maui; Civil No. 12-00198 SOM/BMK; ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS . Rapanos v., Whether the County of Maui had fair notice ... Wildlife Fund v. Cty. of Maui, No. 12-00198 SOM/BMK, 2015 WL 3903918 (D. ... hawaii.gov, cc: David Albright, Elizabeth ..., An official website of the United States government. Here's how you know, Court in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020), in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program for point source discharges that travel through groundwater before reaching a water of the United States. Consistent with EPA Guidance;, Court’s recent Clean Water Act (CWA) decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260 (U.S. Apr. 23, 2020). These entities may now face both governmental and private suits if they fail to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from state or federal authorities—even though they are not, NGWA: initial guidance document "falls short" The National Ground Water Association has submitted comments to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in response to their draft guidance to the regulated community and permitting authorities on applying the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, in the Clean Water Act Section 402 ..., Nov 6, 2019 · The U.S. Supreme Court has now decided County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund (No. 18-260). statutory interpretation Clean Water Act ENVIRONMENT water environmental law Issues , Sep 28, 2021 · The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a memorandum rescinding the guidance document entitled “Applying the Supreme Court's County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund Decision in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Program,” which was signed on January 14, 2021. The memorandum was ... , County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund is a case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on November 6, 2019, during the court's October 2019-2020 term.The case came on a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.. The court vacated and remanded the 9th Circuit's decision in a 6-3 ruling. The court held "a permit is required when there is ..., Docket for Hawaii Wildlife Fund v. County of Maui, 1:12-cv-00198-SOM-KJM — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. ... Hawaii Wildlife Fund, West Maui Preservation Association, Sierra Club - Maui Group may be submitted to the appropriate judge for approval. The filing party ..., Wildlife Fund v. Cnty. of Maui, CIVIL NO. 12-00198 SOM/KJM, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext's comprehensive legal database ... Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al. v. County of Maui, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 1468 (2020). In other words, a person desiring to discharge any pollutant from a point source into the navigable waters of the United States ..., Apr 28, 2020 · The issue in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, one which had long divided the lower courts, was this: everyone agrees that the Clean Water Act regulates, and requires National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits for, the discharge of pollutants to waters of the United States from point sources; and everyone agrees that ... , Feb 1, 2021 · 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020). 2 Guidance Memorandum, Applying the Supreme Court’s County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund Decision in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge ... , Honua Kai Maui Resort is a luxurious vacation destination that offers breathtaking ocean views and exceptional amenities. Located on the beautiful Kaanapali Beach in Lahaina, Hawaii, this resort is perfect for those who want to enjoy a rela..., Date Filed Document Text; March 30, 2018: Filing 9029896430 Filed order and amended opinion (MARY M. SCHROEDER, DOROTHY W. NELSON and M. MARGARET MCKEOWN). Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMEDThe Opinion filed on February 1, 2018, is amended as follows:(SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) With these amendments, Judge McKeown voted to deny County of Maui s Petition for Rehearing En Banc., 29 avr. 2020 ... ... of litigation, the Supreme Court has handed down its long-anticipated decision in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. The 6-3, Lisa Soronen. June 4, 2019. In County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, the Supreme Court will decide whether groundwater is subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting requirements under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The State and Local Legal Center (SLLC) filed an amicus curie brief arguing that it ..., County of Maui v. Hawai'i Wildlife Fund. No. 18-260 - Argued November 6, 2019. At Issue. Whether the Clean Water Act requires a permit when pollutants originate from a point source but are conveyed to navigable waters by a nonpoint source, such as groundwater. Advocates., Join us for a Courthouse Steps teleforum on the oral argument for County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. Glenn Roper will examine how the argument. ... Courthouse Steps Oral Argument Teleforum: County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. Nov 8 2019., On 14 January 2021, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a guidance memorandum on the application of the U.S. Supreme Court's 23 April 2020 decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii ...